Legal Opinion

Britton v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1959PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Buenett

Both parties heretofore petitioned for certiorari which certioraris have been granted. Briefs have been filed, arguments heard and we now have the matter for disposition.

On February 2,1958, the insured, aged 70, slipped and fell on icy pavement, breaking his hip. At the time of this fall he was suffering from arteriosclerosis which is usual for a person of this man’s age. Otherwise his health was normal and he was engaged in normal activity for one of this age. In this fall he sustained a fracture of the shaft of the left femur and avulsion of the trochanter of the left femur, leaving visible…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cary v. Preferred Accident InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Provident Life & Accident Ins. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
  3. North American Ins. Co. v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1954
  4. Wheelock v. Provident Life & Acc. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. HudmanTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Interstate Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. GammonsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966
  3. Parker v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Reserve Life Insurance Company v. WhittemoreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API