Legal Opinion

Vance v. Grow

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1934No. 26,459PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoll, J.

This was an action begun by appellants’ complaint in two paragraphs, to which demurrers were filed and overruled, with general denials closing the issues. Special findings were rendered on request with two conclusions of law thereon. The error properly presented is error in each of the conclusions of law. The conclusions were: (1) “The court now concludes the law is with the defendants,” (appellees) and (2) “That the plaintiffs (appellants) should take nothing in this suit, and that the defendants should recover their costs herein.”

The special findings disclose that—Sarah Shultz, a short time…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ransdel v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Westphal v. HeckmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Cox v. ArnsmannIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Alexander v. SpauldingIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Ragsdale v. RagsdaleMississippi Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hunter v. HunterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Hall v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. KOENIG, RECEIVER ETC. v. LeasIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Ratcliff v. RatcliffIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Schwab v. SchwabIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API