Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Einbinder

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 14, 1962No. 16854PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

At the threshold of this case is the question whether the District Court had jurisdiction, under § 21(b) of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 921(b), to review the Deputy Commissioner's action denying compensation. Insofar as the suit below sought review of the original order rejecting the claim, it was brought too late unless the thirty-day period specified in § 21(a), 33 U.S.C. § 921(a), was suspended during the pendency of an application for reconsideration filed by the claimant during that period under § 22, 33 U.S.C. § 922. That problem does not appear…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Pillsbury v. ALASKA PACKERS ASS'N.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  3. Claim of Foerg v. Sackett & Wilhelms Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  4. Claim of Mittiga v.United States Aluminum Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  5. Claim of Strand v. Harris Structural Steel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. EinbinderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API