Thomas v. Einbinder
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
At the threshold of this case is the question whether the District Court had jurisdiction, under § 21(b) of the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 921(b), to review the Deputy Commissioner's action denying compensation. Insofar as the suit below sought review of the original order rejecting the claim, it was brought too late unless the thirty-day period specified in § 21(a), 33 U.S.C. § 921(a), was suspended during the pendency of an application for reconsideration filed by the claimant during that period under § 22, 33 U.S.C. § 922. That problem does not appear…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Pillsbury v. ALASKA PACKERS ASS'N.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Claim of Foerg v. Sackett & Wilhelms Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Claim of Mittiga v.United States Aluminum Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Claim of Strand v. Harris Structural Steel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thomas v. EinbinderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962