Legal Opinion
Claim of Foerg v. Sackett & Wilhelms Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 20, 1937PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Claimant has appealed from a decision of the Industrial Board denying his application to reopen his claim for the purpose of introducing further testimony. Claimant alleges that he sustained an injury to his eye about December 2, 1930, while in the regular course of his employment. No claim for compensation was filed by claimant until June 3, 1935. The Industrial Board denied compensation because the claim was not filed within the statutory time. No appeal was taken from that decision. No appeal lies from a decision of the State Industrial Board denying an application to reopen a case for the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Claim of Sparone v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thomas v. EinbinderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
- Claim of Conklin v. A. R. Dowd Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Claim of McLaskey v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1950
- Claim of Schwartz v. Bernie's Tire & Battery ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Thomas v. EinbinderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962