Legal Opinion

Twenty-Third Street Realty Corp. v. City of Miami Beach

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 13, 1939PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Buford, J. —

On the 4th day of January, 1916, a dedication declaration was made and executed by the land owners on a plat of a subdivision identified as Amended Map of “The Ocean Front Property of the Miami Beach Improvement Company.”

The record shows conclusively that there was never any formal or record acceptance of the dedication on behalf of the Municipality or of the County in which the subdivision was located. Therefore, unless the dedication became consummated by user, there was no dedication of the streets described on the plat and involved in this suit.

On May 29th, 1917, Ordinance No.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Miami v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. City of Palmetto v. KatschSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  3. Burns v. McDanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. Kirkland v. City of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  5. Couture v. County of DadeSupreme Court of Florida · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Miami Beach v. Miami Beach Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1943
  2. Robinson v. the Town of RivieraSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  3. City of St. Petersburg v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1943
  4. Cannon v. Putnam CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API