Legal Opinion
Towns of Madbury v. State
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 30, 1975No. 6931PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.
The towns of Madbury and Lee are seeking to recover damages against the State of New Hampshire for the misapplication of foundation aid under RSA chs. 195 and 198. They have previously attempted, without success, to recover misapplication in foun*197dation aid. Madbury v. Durham, 108 N.H. 474, 240 A.2d 760 (1968). The Oyster River Cooperative School District was added as a party defendant in the present case in order that full relief might be granted. The State of New Hampshire filed a motion to dismiss contending that their claim of sovereign immunity precluded granting the requested relief and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- J. Dunn & Sons, Inc. v. Paragon Homes of New England, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- Roberts v. Richard & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973
- Monadnock Regional School District v. FitzwilliamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1964
- Krzysztalowski v. FortinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967
- Hampton v. MarvinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Guerin v. New Hampshire Catholic Charities, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Clark v. Exeter Co-Operative BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Guerin v. New Hampshire Catholic Charities, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Towns of Madbury v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975