Legal Opinion
Hampton v. Marvin
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided July 9, 1963No. 5114PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLampron, J.
The first two questions transferred are the following:
“1. Is RSA 76:16A (Laws of 1955, Chapter 162, Section 1) constitutional?
“2. Are the orders of the Commission involved in this proceeding invalid because of lack of notice to the Town and hearing?”
These questions relate to the nature of the powers granted and of the obligations imposed on the State Tax Commission by RSA 76:16-a (supp). They involve matters of public importance which should be decided in these proceedings. Lisbon v. Lisbon Village District, 104 N. H. 255, 257, 258.
RSA 76:16-a (supp) provides that if the selectmen on a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boody v. WatsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1886
- Edes v. BoardmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879
- Morrison v. ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1879
- Hill v. MarvinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1954
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949
3Cited by13 opinions
- Estate of Kennett v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Dartmouth Corp. of Alpha Delta v. Town of HanoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Hancock v. City of ConcordSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- McCann v. SilvaDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.