Lissberger v. Kellogg
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On rule to show cause.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Swayze, J.
The action is for damages caused by the failure of the defendants to deliver wool in accordance with the contract between them and the plaintiff. The plaintiff is a wool merchant in Yew York; the defendants are wool brokers and dealers at Buenos Ayres in the Argentine. In the summer of 1905 the plaintiff ordered some thirty bales of wool, of which ten bales were to be Lincoln, ten bales one-fourth blood and ten bales three-eighths. The order was accepted, but thirty-five bales were shipped instead of thirty. The invoice described the wool as…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Grupe v. GlickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Wolstenholme, Inc. v. Jos. Randall Bro., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Elliott-Lewis Corp. v. York-Shipley, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Boyce v. FowlerDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1949
- J. L. Owens Co. v. Leland Farmers Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.