Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Coffey v. William R. Austin Construction Co.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided July 8, 1977No. CIV-76-0988-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE
DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff brings this action against Defendants in this Court under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 270b(b). The contract bonded and involved herein was performed in connection with the Dierks Lake Project on the Saline River in the state of Arkansas. The above cited statute provides that:
“(b) Every suit instituted under this section shall be brought in the name of the United States for the use of the person suing, in the United States District Court for any district in which the contract was to be performed and executed and not elsewhere, . . .”
Our…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dewell v. LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- John J. Joyce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Frank Savarese v. Edrick Transfer & Storage, Inc., a Wisconsin CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States Ex Rel. Fairbanks Morse & Co. v. Bero Construction Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Louis Allen McDaniel Jr. v. The University of Chicago and Argonne, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McClure Estimating Co. v. H. G. Reynolds Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- United States ex rel. Brown Minneapolis Tank Co. v. Kinley Construction Co.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2011
- Spectacor Management Group v. Matthew G. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Spectacor Management Group v. Matthew G. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Spectacor Mgt Grp v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997