Legal Opinion

Van Hook v. United States

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 23, 1951No. 50 C 1559PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(a) (1) for the recovery of 1946 income taxes, which taxes he alleges were illegally assessed and collected in the sum of $3,410.34 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from March 15, 1947.

The complaint alleges that plaintiff is an attorney; that, in 1941, one Thomas McConnell, also an attorney, began work in an anti-trust action that subsequently ripened into a lawsuit known as Bigelow v. RKO Picture, 7 Cir., 170 F.2d 783; ■ that in July, 1943 he moved into a suite of offices occupied by plaintiff and three…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tompkins v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  2. Rupple v. KuhlCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  3. Chapman v. DwyerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  4. Marshall v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
  5. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Glick v. Empire Box Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
  2. Van Hook v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API