Legal Opinion

Van Hook v. United States

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 8, 1952No. 50 C 1559Published

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

Plaintiff brings this action under the provisions of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(a)(1) to recover 1946 income taxes which he alleges were illegally assessed and collected.

Plaintiff is one of several attorneys who share a suite of offices in Chicago, Illinois. The attorneys share office expenses, but do not share income, unless they agree to work together on a particular case. In *500September 1941, one Thomas C. McConnell, an attorney, began work on a case which was subsequently litigated. The case, known as Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, was argued and decided in the United…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  3. Rupple v. KuhlCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  4. Bigelow v. RKO Radio PicturesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1948
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Elder W. Marshall, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Elder W. Marshall and Bessie I. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API