Legal Opinion

Simindinger v. Meeker

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 20, 2021No. 11-21-02PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Simindinger v. Meeker,

2021-Ohio-3274.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT PAULDING COUNTY TIMOTHY W. SIMINDINGER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CASE NO. 11-21-02 v. BRENT J. MEEKER, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. Appeal from Paulding County Common Pleas Court Trial Court No. CI 18 129 Judgment Affirmed Date of Decision: September 20, 2021 APPEARANCES: Scott R. Gordon for Appellant Shane M. Lee for Appellee Case No. 11-21-02 ZIMMERMAN, J. {¶1} This appeal, having been placed on the accelerated calendar, is sua sponte being assigned and considered on the regular calendar…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Pons v. Ohio State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henry Cty. Bank v. Toledo Radio, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. Lima Mem. Hosp. v. WatamuraOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API