G. & R. WATERPROOFING CO. v. Brogdon
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Judge.
The issues in the two appeals are identical. The allegations of each petition essential to- our decision are in substance the same. In this opinion, therefore, all the discussion will relate to> both petitions and both plaintiffs.
Essentially the allegations of the petition are: The car in which plaintiff was a passenger and the truck driven by the defendant Murph (in the business of the defendant G. & R. Waterproofing Co., Inc.) were approaching an intersection in opposite directions; as the car in which plaintiff was riding approached the intersection, defendant negligently drove…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Williams v. GrierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. CoxwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
- Toler v. GoodinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Long Construction Co. v. RyalsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Richards & Associates, Inc. v. StudstillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ford Motor Company v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Ford Motor Company v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Standard Oil Company v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Standard Oil Company v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Wood v. Hub Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.