Legal Opinion
Manous v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided August 23, 2013No. CIV-11-1330-RPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DAVID L. RUSSELL, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment, filed by Defendant, Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Plaintiff responded in opposition to the motion. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the Court finds as follows.
Plaintiff alleges Defendant is liable for the death of his spouse, Carol Manous, who died on March 12, 2010. At the time of her death, Mrs. Manous was wearing two 100 ng/ml Mylan Fentanyl Transdermal System patches, as prescribed.1 The medical examiner did not conduct an autopsy, concluding based on postmortem blood…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Hollander v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Oja v. Howmedica, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Strubhart v. Perry Memorial Hospital Trust AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Jones by Jones v. Lederle LaboratoriesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Johnson v. Mylan Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2015