Legal Opinion
Grano v. Long Island Railroad
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 8, 1993No. 90 Civ. 2407 (RJW)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
These are the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Rule 52, Fed. R.Civ.P.
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. Stipulated Facts
At all times relevant, Louis J. Grano (“Grano”) was’ employed by defendant as a signal maintainer; Herbert Buchbinder (“Buchbinder”) was. employed by defendant as a signalman; Pieter V. Cortelyou (“Cortelyou”) was employed by defendant as a signal maintainer; and Sam Raccioppi (“Raccioppi”) was employed by defendant as a signal inspector.
The Long Island Railroad (“LIRR”) is a public benefit…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Richard Gallose v. Long Island Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Raymond D. Robert v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- John Dechico, Cross-Appellee v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Roberson, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2000
- Union Pacific Railroad Company v. William NamiTexas Supreme Court · 2016
- Paul v. Genesee & Wyoming Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2000
- Swartout v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Deviney v. Union Pacific R. Co.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.