Barlow v. Palmer

Opinion

McLACHLAN, J.

The plaintiffs1 brought this action in two counts, claiming that they acquired title to a certain parcel known as the “Reserved for Road” parcel (parcel) by reason of adverse possession and that the defendants2 had abandoned any right, title and interest to the parcel. The plaintiffs sought a judgment determining the rights of the parties in and to the parcel. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly rendered summary judgment in favor of the defendants John M. Maiorino, Jr., and his wife, Lanette M. Maiorino, as to the adverse possession count of the…