Commonwealth v. Springer
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
POPOVICH, J.:
¶ 1 Appellant Carl W. Springer appeals the order denying his Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) 1 petition claiming that the sentence imposed was illegal; and counsel was ineffective for permitting him to plead guilty. We affirm.
¶ 2 The facts and procedural history of this case are as follows:
[Appellant] pleaded guilty on September 9, 2003 to Burglary, Theft, Receiving Stolen Property, Criminal Mischief and Possession with Intent to Deliver at Criminal Number 982 C 2003. The factual basis of the plea was [Appellant’s] forced entry into Hayden’s Pharmacy on November…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BasemoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. RaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. JordanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Commonwealth v. NatividadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by141 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. DixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. WeatherillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. KingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.