Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Springer

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 2008No. 341 WDA 2008PublishedCited by 141 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

POPOVICH, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant Carl W. Springer appeals the order denying his Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA) 1 petition claiming that the sentence imposed was illegal; and counsel was ineffective for permitting him to plead guilty. We affirm.

¶ 2 The facts and procedural history of this case are as follows:

[Appellant] pleaded guilty on September 9, 2003 to Burglary, Theft, Receiving Stolen Property, Criminal Mischief and Possession with Intent to Deliver at Criminal Number 982 C 2003. The factual basis of the plea was [Appellant’s] forced entry into Hayden’s Pharmacy on November…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BasemoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Commonwealth v. RaganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Commonwealth v. JordanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. NatividadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by141 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. KellySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Commonwealth v. DixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. WeatherillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Commonwealth v. KingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API