United States v. Meyers
District Court, D. Wyoming
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MEYERS’ RELIGION DEFENSE
BRIMMER, District Judge.
The United States charged Meyers with two offenses stemming from marijuana possession and trafficking. Meyers asserts that the United States cannot prosecute him for these crimes because, as a “Reverend” of the “Church of Marijuana,” his possession and distribution of marijuana is legally protected religious conduct.
The delicate issue before the Court is whether the “Church of Marijuana” is a bona fide religion that triggers the protections of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (“RFRA”). 42 U.S.C. § 2000bb et seq. Because this issue…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Prince v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. David MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Friedman v. Southern California Permanente Medical GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Scottish Rite Cathedral Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Hubbard v. J Message Grp. Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2018
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.