Legal Opinion

Allen v. Demarest

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 15, 1886PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On motion to dismiss, heard on bill and notice.

1Opinion of the Court

Van Fleet, V. C.

This is a motion to dismiss the complainant’s bill on the ground that the matter in dispute is beneath the jurisdiction of the court. The bill is filed to enforce a right to an equitable set-off. The complainant, in January, 1882, demised certain lands to the defendant, by lease under seal. The complainant neglected to perform one of the covenants of his lease requiring him to make certain repairs. The defendant brought suit against him for such default, and in September, 1884, recovered a judgment in the circuit court of Bergen county for $70. The defendant, at the time he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. A. C. & W. A. Smets v. WilliamsNew York Court of Chancery · 1834
  2. Douw v. SheldenNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  3. Moore v. LyttleNew York Court of Chancery · 1819
  4. Fullerton v. JacksonNew York Court of Chancery · 1821

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tritschler v. CartwrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API