Legal Opinion

Rhodessa Development Co. v. Simpson

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided August 31, 1983No. 08-82-00363-CVPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

OSBORN, Justice.

When a real estate sales contract was not consummated because the land was not rezoned, the seller obtained a judgment for recovery of the purchaser’s earnest money deposit based upon the purchaser’s failure to use due and reasonable diligence to obtain a zoning change. We affirm.

J.M. Simpson and Rhodessa Development Company entered into an earnest money contract whereby Simpson was to sell Rho-dessa 15.91 acres of land within the City of Midland. Rhodessa deposited $20,000.00 as earnest money with Lone Star Abstract and Title Company. The contract provided that if…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Nelson v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  3. Willeford v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Knox v. TownesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Berman v. RifeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. New, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  2. House of Lloyd, Inc. v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  3. Culbertson v. BrodskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Informed Physician Services, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Maryland, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  5. Maverick Natural Resources, LLC Breitburn Operating LP And Breitburn Operating GP, LLC v. Glenn D. Cooper Oil & Gas, Inc. D/B/A Cooper Oil & Gas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API