Legal Opinion

Kimball v. Casey

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided December 11, 1929No. 7269PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.)

“An administrator is authorized to provide for the estate competent legal counsel, according to the exigencies of the estate he represents.” Civil Code (1910), § 4010. In exercising this power an administrator should use the same care as a prudent man would exercise in employing competent legal counsel in a matter in which he is personally concerned. Lawton v. Fish, 51 Ga. 647, 651. Contracts between attorneys and client, wherein it is stipu*637lated that each of the attorneys is to receive a certain per cent, of the amount collected, for services rendered in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moses v. Bagley & SewellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  2. Twiggs v. ChambersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  3. Lawton & Willingham v. FishSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sellers v. City of SummervilleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  2. Estes v. CollumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
  3. Burch v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
  4. Cromer v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  5. Estes v. CollumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API