Legal Opinion

Estes v. Collum

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 25, 1954No. 35162PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuillian, J.

The demurrers to the petition, the attack upon the jurisdiction of the court of ordinary, and the various grounds of the motion for new trial deal in substance with a *190single issue—whether a plaintiff heir, who has recovered and brought into the estate certain funds representing land held by the administrators adversely to it, may in a direct action, obtain an order of the ordinary having jurisdiction of the estate, granting reasonable attorney fees to her for the use of the lawyers prosecuting the actions which resulted in bringing the fund into the estate. Special grounds 5, 6, and 7 of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McDowell v. McDowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  2. Harrison v. HolsenbeckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  3. Ewing v. First Nat. Bank of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  4. Ross v. BattleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. Greer v. BurnamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of GarmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. In Re Estate of HaringCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. McFarland v. LumpkinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  4. Cromer v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  5. Braswell v. BentonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API