Legal Opinion
In re Kahn
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 16, 1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.
Controversies having arisen between Montifiore G. Kahn, the petitioner, and The National City Bank of New York concerning certain ruble deposits theretofore made with the bank in Russia, a written agreement of settlement was executed between these parties on December 30, 1931, which contained a provision for the submission of specified controverted issues to an arbitrator designated therein. That agreement, however, was not acknowledged by the parties. At that time section 1449 of the Civil Practice Act provided: “A submission authorized by the last section shall be in writing, duly…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Matter of Berkovitz v. . Arbib HoulbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- The People v. . SturtevantNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
- Williams v. . BarkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Finsilver, Still & Moss, Inc. v. Goldberg, Maas & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Dwight v. . St. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Towers, Perrin, Forster & Crosby, Inc. v. B. Peter Brown and David F. RidingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984