Williams v. Lane
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
*151Nichols, Judge.
The sole question to be decided in both cases is whether the trial court erred in refusing to grant the. defendants’ motion for a continuance, which motion was made after the plaintiffs’ counsel asked the prospective jurors: “Are any of you policy holders in the American Fire & Casualty Insurance Company?”
Assuming, but not deciding, that the motion was proper (See Fievet v. Curl, 96 Ga. App. 535, 536, 101 S. E. 2d 181), the question asked the prospective jurors was not an improper question per se. In the case of Parker v. Bryan, 96 Ga. App. 283, 284 (99 S. E. 2d 810), it was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Fievet v. CurlCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Parker v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
3Cited by6 opinions
- Leggett v. BrewtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Weatherbee v. HutchesonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- Haston v. HightowerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Williams v. LaneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Young v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.