Legal Opinion

Rizzo v. Euclid Urbana Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 9, 1960No. 1414PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLEN, Chief Judge.

This action was instituted in the law side of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County to recover money allegedly due on the purchase of certain goods from the Euclid Urbana Company’s assignor, United Laboratories.

The trial judge, in the midst of a jury trial, on his own accord without request from either party in this action, announced that the case was too difficult for a jury and that he was declaring a mistrial and transferring the case to the equity docket. The defendant below, appellant here, objected to the court’s action and, after final decree on the equity side,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Frierson v. FriersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  2. Massengale v. O'HaraSupreme Court of Florida · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hightower v. BigoneySupreme Court of Florida · 1963
  2. Dahlawi v. RamlawiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Cheek v. McGowan Elec. Supply Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  4. Martell & Sons, Inc. v. FriedmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. O'Donoghue v. S. A. M. Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API