Legal Opinion

O'Donoghue v. S. A. M. Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 11, 1961No. 60-669Published

1Per curiam

Appellant, plaintiff below, filed his amended complaint against the appellees, defendants below, in a chancery suit.

This appeal is from a final order of the chancellor dismissing, without prejudice, plaintiff’s amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action cognizable in equity.

We find the chancellor was correct in his holding that the amended complaint failed to state a cause of action cognizable in equity. However, we find he was in error in dismissing the amended complaint instead of transferring the case to the law side of the court in accordance with rule 1.39, Florida Rules of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cook v. CENTRAL & SOUTHERN FLORIDA FLOOD CON. DIST.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  2. Rizzo v. Euclid Urbana Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Staiger v. GrebDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API