Legal Opinion
Consolidated Rendering Co. v. Stewart
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided August 8, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSturgis, J.
This is an action on a demand note given the Consolidated Rendering Co. by the defendant, George E. Stewart, and secured by a chattel mortgage on two horses. The defendant, F. A. Farwell, is involved only as an accommodation signer of the note. The issue presented is as to the amount for which judgment should be entered. The case is reported on an agreed statement of facts.
The mortgage, as originally written, in addition to the usual provisions, included an agreement that, on default of any condition, it should be lawful for the mortgagee to take possession of *141and sell any or all of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Peugh v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- In Re the Appraisal for Taxation, Under the Act in Relation to Taxable Transfers of Property, of the Estate of GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Luckett v. TownsendTexas Supreme Court · 1848
- Desseau v. HolmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Landers v. GeorgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Portland Savings Bank v. LandrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
- CIT Corporation v. HaynesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
- Gallagher v. Aroostook Federation of FarmersSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1938
- Susi v. Belle Acton Stables, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
- John Susi v. Belle Acton Stables, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966