Legal Opinion
Briggs & Stratton Corp. v. Royal Globe Insurance
District Court, M.D. Georgia
Decided August 25, 1999No. CIV.A. 597CV5692 (WDO)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
OWENS, District Judge.
Defendant Transcontinental Insurance Company has filed a motion for partial summary judgment. Transcontinental argues that Wisconsin law applies to construction of its liability policy issued to defendant Briggs & Stratton (“B & S”), and that under Wisconsin law, remediation conducted by B & S pursuant to a United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) Order and Notice of Violation of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division (“EPD”) does not constitute “damages” under the policy. Transcontinental further asks the court to…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re Tri-State Crematory LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2003
- Ameron Internat. Corp. v. Insurance Co. of State of PennsylvaniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Pacific Employers Insurance v. Servco Pacific Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2003
- Federated Rural Electric Insurance Exchange v. R.D. Moody & Associates, Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 2005
- Ameron Internat. Corp. v. Insurance Co. of State of PennsylvaniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010