Legal Opinion
Haar v. . Schloss
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 5, 1914PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Appeal by plaintiffs from Allen, J., at February Term, 1914, of New HaNOVER.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.-
It appearing from an inspection of the record that it is necessary for the heirs at law of Mary Christ to be made parties in this action, in order that an adjudication binding upon all persons interested in the land shall be made, it is ordered that the action be remanded, to the end that said heirs be made parties.
Eemanded.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Murdaugh v. Traders & Mechanics Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- Bethune v. New York Underwriters Ins.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1951