Legal Opinion
Flushing National Bank v. Municipal Assistance Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 17, 1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames Gibson, J.
Plaintiff in Action No. 2 moves (1) for an order determining whether that action is to be maintained as a class action (CPLR 904) and (2) for an order consolidating it with Action No. 1 (CPLR 602, subd [a]).
In Action No. 2, the complaint challenges the constitutionality of the New York State Emergency Moratorium Act for the City of New York (L 1975, ch 874, as amd by ch 875) as violative of the just compensation provisions of the Federal and State Constitutions as in cases of appropriations of property. The complaint relates to notes issued by the city and purportedly subject to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jones v. BermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Douglaston Civic Ass'n v. GalvinNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Rivera v. TrimarcoNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Flushing National Bank v. Municipal Assistance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Shook v. LavineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Friar v. Vanguard Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Flushing National Bank v. Municipal Assistance Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1977
- Flushing National Bank v. Municipal Assistance Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1977
- Corcoran v. QuickNew York Supreme Court · 1981