Legal Opinion
Flushing National Bank v. Municipal Assistance Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames Gibson, J.
The court has for decision related motions in connection with the continuing litigation involving the city’s short-term notes, as follows:
Motion No. 1 by Martin Aaron et al. to intervene in this action on the grounds set forth in CPLR 1012 (subd [a], pars 2, 3).
Motion No. 2 by Martin Aaron to intervene in this action on the ground set forth in CPLR 1012 (subd [a], par 2) for the limited purpose stated.
Cross motion by defendant City of New York to disqualify movants’ attorney A. Lawrence Washburn, Jr. from serving as counsel in this or any related action.
The motions and cross motion were…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Watts v. Swiss Bank Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
- In re the Estate of WeinstockNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Flushing National Bank v. Municipal Assistance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Handelman v. WeissDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re HofAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Blue Planet Software, Inc. v. Games International, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- New York University v. SimonCivil Court of the City of New York · 1985