Legal Opinion

State v. Heintze

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1992No. Cr. 910225PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVINE, Justice.

Troy Eugene Heintze appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on jury verdicts finding him guilty of one count of theft by “unauthorized conduct” and three counts of theft by deception. We affirm.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdicts, the evidence established that during the summer of 1990, Heintze, who was employed as a car salesman, and his girlfriend, Kim Dufault, became interested in purchasing a 1986 Chevrolet Camaro Iroc from Donald Spieker. In late May or early June 1990, Dufault obtained a $7,000 loan from Metropolitan Federal Bank to purchase the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Carlee BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. Millard P. ChambersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Clyde SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  4. State v. SmudaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. PurdyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. McDonellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. McNairNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. PerreaultNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. City of Grand Forks v. DohmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API