Legal Opinion

Stilp v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 3, 2007PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

In this original jurisdiction matter, a resident taxpayer challenges on constitutional grounds an amendment to Article XIV of The County Code,1 known as Act 57 of 2005,2 which in part allowed sitting district attorneys to convert from part-time to full-time status, with an accompanying increase in compensation. The General Assembly and the presiding officer of each house are named as Respondents.

Currently before the Court are Respondents’ preliminary objections to the Petition for Review filed by Gene Stilp, who is representing himself. For reasons more fully discussed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Consumer Party of Pennsylvania v. Com.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Stilp v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Pittsburgh Palisades Park, LLC v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Costopoulos v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Finn v. RendellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. R.H.S. v. Allegheny County Department of Human ServicesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Gregory v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Szoko v. TOWNSHIP OF WILKINSCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. PILCHESKY v. DohertyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API