Legal Opinion

People v. Alexander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 26, 1988PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Kassal, J.

In accordance with the prosecutor’s obligation to deal fairly with an accused and candidly with the courts, there must be immediate and forthright disclosure when a prosecution witness’s testimony has impaired the fact-finding process of the Grand Jury.

During the early evening hours of Sunday, May 19, 1985, defendant was discovered on the sixth floor of a commercial building located at 900 Broadway in Manhattan by Police Officers Donna Zangara and Julio Dobles, who arrived at the location in response to a radio communication reporting a burglary in progress. As…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. PelchatNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. FordNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. HaneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. People v. HallettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. People v. CunninghamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. People v. GonzalezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. People v. CantyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API