Legal Opinion

Rodgers v. Dixon

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 18, 1940No. 3 Div. 305PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The bill as amended sought redemption under the statute and the rules that obtain in a court of equity.

The decree on demurrers to the bill as originally filed eliminated the feature as to the right of redemption under the statute for failure to surrender to purchaser on due demand. Baker v. Burdeshaw, 132 Ala. 166, 31 So. 497; Dewberry v. Bank of Standing Rock, 227 Ala. 484, 150 So. 463.

The decree further held that "the sale was not in strict accord with the powers of sale contained in the mortgage and provided by law.

It is insisted that the powers sought to be exercised as to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hodge v. JoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Kelly v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Dewberry v. Bank of Standing RockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  4. Mahone v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1863
  5. Dozier v. FarriorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. George v. Federal Land Bank of JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Rudisill v. BucknerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. Moore v. HortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Durr Drug Co. v. AcreeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  5. Southeast Enterprises, Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API