Legal Opinion
Bergin v. Anderson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 15, 1926PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Upon reargument, order, in so far as it denies a motion to resettle an order so as to recite all papers used upon the original motion, reversed upon the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Such an order is appealable. (American Audit Co. v. Industrial Federation, 87 App. Div. 275; Farmers’ National Bank v. Underwood, 12 id. 269; Deutermann v. Pollock, 36 id. 522; Tuska v. Jarvis, 61 Misc. 224.) Decisions holding that an order denying a motion for resettlement is not appealable relate to motions made to modify or change the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- West Side National Bank of Chicago v. Warsaw Discount BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- American Audit Co. v. Industrial Federation of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Tuska v. JarvisAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1908
3Cited by18 opinions
- Haimes v. SchonwitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- Kay-Fries, Inc. v. MartinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Cohn v. CohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Lewin v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. Interboro Asphalt Surface Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.