Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Bear.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 4, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action for personal injury. As appears from the petition, plaintiff was a farm hand in the employ of defendant. His hand was injured while working about an ensilage cutter by being caught in the machinery, cogs and chain of a revolving apron forming a part of the cutter and being operated in connection with it. The injury occurred August 6, 1928, the extent of which is described, and the petition alleges: "That said revolving apron is so constructed that the chain and cog wheels on the lower part thereof were open, exposed, unguarded and dangerous;" that the cutter was being used by defendant…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sylcord v. HornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  2. Plew v. James Horrabin & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Henderson v. Heman Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Chapman v. PiechowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Stoll v. Frank Adam Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Akers v. Warson Garden ApartmentsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  2. Blanco v. Sun Ranches, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Pacific Intermountain Express Co. v. State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Graham v. WheelerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Shaw v. KendallMontana Supreme Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API