Turick v. Erdmann
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
These are two suits for partition. Complainants in each case assert title to an undivided one-half of the land and concede to defendants the other half. Defendants claim the whole.
Jacob W. Vogt and his sister, the complainant Elizabeth Turick, were tenants in common of a tract of land subject to a life estate of their mother. The three agreed in 1912 to partition the tract and, pursuant to their agreement, Jacob Vogt and wife, and Mrs. Turick and husband, deeded to their mother in fee part of the land. Jacob Vogt and wife and his mother conveyed to Mrs. Turick and her husband another part.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Van Renesselaer v. KearneySupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Northrup v. AckermanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1914
- Comstock v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1832
- Hannon v. ChristopherNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1881
- Howe v. HarringtonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1867
3Cited by2 opinions
- McLaughlin v. LambournNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Sharples Corp. v. Sinclair Wyoming Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1946