Howe v. Harrington
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
This suit, brought by Samuel O. Howe, oí New York, against Cornelius Van Winkle and G. H. Harrington and wife, is to compel the defendants to convey to the complainant a tract of land in Hudson city, in this state. This tract had been conveyed by Van Winkle to Harrington, on the nineteenth day of December, 1863, by a deed which the complainant alleges was fraudulent, and designed and executed to defraud him.
The complainant claims title through a deed dated September thirteenth, 1859, made hy Cornelius Van Winkle, by William M. Gitt as his attorney, to Hamilton W. Shipman, *496by…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Turick v. ErdmannNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933