Legal Opinion
Miller v. California Pacific Medical Center
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 13, 1993No. Nos. 92-15721, 92-15746PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:
We decide when a preliminary injunction constitutes “just and proper” interim relief in an unfair labor practice case.
Background1
Children’s Hospital of San Francisco and Pacific Presbyterian Medical Center used to be independent hospitals in San Francisco. In July 1990 they decided to merge based on an estimate that integration of their facilities would save as much as $60 million over the first five years of operation by reducing duplication of services, equipment and staff. See CR 20 at 3-4. The Federal Trade Commission approved the merger, which became final on June…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lockheed Missile & Space Co. v. Hughes Aircraft Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Robert H. Miller, Regional Director of Region 20 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the National Labor Relations Board v. California Pacific Medical Center, Robert H. Miller, Regional Director of Region 20 of the National Labor Relations Board, for and on Behalf of the National Labor Relations Board v. California Pacific Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993