Legal Opinion
Gross v. Gross
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 27, 1961PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLouis L. Friedman, J.
Plaintiff sues in an action where, in the prayer for relief, he seeks a declaratory judgment, an accounting, and for unlawfully inducing a breach of a contract. Defendants now move for an order pursuant to rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice dismissing the complaint on the grounds that the court does not have jurisdiction of the subject of the action and that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; or, in the alternative, pursuant to rule 102 of the Buies of Civil Practice, to make the complaint more definite and certain.
The allegations of the first cause of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- James v. Alderton Dock Yards, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Rockland Light and Power Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Lamb v. S. Cheney & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- S. C. Posner Co. v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nifty Foods Corporation v. The Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Inc. And Pet IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Yonofsky v. WernickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1973
- Zaro Licensing, Inc. v. Cinmar, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Island Air, Inc. v. LaBarCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Lauter v. W & J SLOANE, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 1976