Legal Opinion

Martin Marietta Corp. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided September 23, 1983No. 572-77PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WIESE, Judge.

The question presently before the court in this multi-issue tax refund suit is whether plaintiffs, owners of a limestone bearing property, are entitled to a casualty loss deduction for the value of the mineral in place when exploratory drilling reveals groundwater of unanticipated volume that (i) floods a portion of the property and (ii) induces abandonment of mining operations on the remainder because of economic im-practieality. We conclude that a casualty loss deduction is allowable only to the extent of the loss in market value attributable to the property actually…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Citizens Bank of Weston v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  2. Malcolm J. Henley and Mary K. Henley v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  3. Westvaco Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  2. Martin Marietta Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985
  3. Martin Marietta Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API