Legal Opinion

Carlton v. Castranova

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1961No. Civ. 24810PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

From a judgment in favor of defendants after a nonjury trial, in an action to have defendants declared trustees of certain corporate stock, plaintiffs appeal.

All parties except defendant Cavanaugh are physicians and he is a professional hospital administrator. They joined together in a project to establish a hospital. Each paid $12,500 toward the purchase of the land and loaned money to a corporation formed by them (Castranova and Robone being treated as one unit). Pursuant to permit, 125 shares of stock in the corporation were issued to each of the five participants in exchange for loans…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brewer v. SimpsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Ryder v. BambergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Learned v. CastleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Logan v. ForsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Balding v. Atchison Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Chapple v. Big Bear Super Market No. 3California Court of Appeal · 1980
  3. Gai v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Metcalf v. MetcalfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API