Legal Opinion

Hollywood Calling v. Public Utility Commission

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 10, 1991No. 3-89-067-CVPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Hollywood Calling filed suit in the district court of Travis County seeking declaratory relief as to the validity of substantive rule 23.32(b)(7) and (8), 16 Tex.Admin.Code § 23.32(b)(7), (8) (West Sept. 1, 1988), of appellee Public Utility Commission. See Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 6252-13a, § 12 (Supp.1991). The district court concluded, in pertinent part, that rule 23.-32(b)(7) and (8) is valid and permanently enjoined Hollywood Calling from violating rule 23.32(b)(7). We will reverse the judgment of the district court.

The portion of rule 23.32(b) 1 at issue prohibits the use of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gerst v. Oak Cliff Savings and Loan AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State Board of Insurance v. DeffebachCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Bexar County Bail Bond Board v. DeckardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Kelly Ex Rel. Kelly v. Industrial Accident Board of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  5. Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. Texas Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Arco Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. Texas Department of Human Services v. Christian Care Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  3. McCarty v. Texas Parks & Wildlife Department, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
  4. Chrysler Motors Corp. v. Texas Motor Vehicle CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  5. Cities of Allen v. Railroad Commission of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API