Legal Opinion

People v. Nash

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 8, 1911No. Crim. No. 234PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Frank H. Dunne, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

This is an appeal by the people from a judgment for defendant entered upon demurrer to an indictment charging him with a felony.

Respondent in his brief raises the point that this court has no jurisdiction of the appeal because not taken in accordance with the law in force at the time it was taken.

Upon being arraigned the defendant filed a demurrer to the indictment, which was by the court overruled. The defendant entered a plea of “not guilty,” and the cause came on for trial. A jury was impaneled and some testimony taken, when, after certain objections made by defendant to the introduction…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pignaz v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. WebbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. People v. RodleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. People v. StollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. People v. HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. People v. HathcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Hanley v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Henry v. LingsweilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. People v. FinchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API