Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Sherman

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided May 1, 2007No. 05-P-1409PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrasso, J.

On appeal from an order allowing a motion for a new trial, the Commonwealth contends that a Superior Court judge erred in concluding that the defendant’s guilty plea was not intelligent. We agree and reverse the order allowing the new trial motion.

1. Background. Indicted for aggravated rape and assault with intent to murder, the defendant, Larry H. Sherman, Jr., pleaded guilty in 1993 to the lesser offenses of rape and assault. After *798colloquy, a judge accepted the jointly recommended disposition and imposed, for the rape, a sentence of six to ten years in prison, with six months to be served…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GallantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. FosterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. McGuirkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. DeMarcoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. LopezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CrossWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. GordonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. ShermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. EstradaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API