Legal Opinion

Pope v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 16, 1976PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant Pope, an indigent, was convicted of first degree murder. He appealed his conviction, and was given a free lawyer, and finally, was given a free transcript. Pope obviously failed to timely file a transcript of the evidence or request an extension of time within which to file. Nevertheless, the Court of Criminal Appeals remanded his cause to the Circuit Court with directions that a transcript of the evidence should be filed with the Circuit Clerk within sixty days. The transcript of the evidence, which was filed twenty-two days late with the circuit clerk, contained a court reporter's…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Draper v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Seals v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  5. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. HatasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. MacK v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  2. Pope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  3. Rika v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  4. Ladd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API