Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided October 19, 1976No. 7 Div. 393PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOOKOUT, Judge.

Robbery; sentence: ten years.

The transcript of the evidence was filed late. In addition there is some question as to the accuracy of the transcript. The Supreme Court has held that the appellant’s appeal must be dismissed for failure to timely file a transcript of the evidence unless failure to file said transcript was not the fault of the appellant. Ex parte State; In re: Smith v. State (1976), Ala., 346 So.2d 464. Also see Ex parte State; In re: Pope v. State (1976), Ala., 345 So.2d 1385.

On January 6, 1976, the Circuit Judge of Calhoun County, Honorable William C. Bibb, in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. HatasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  2. Pope v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Pope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Huffman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  2. Ladd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  3. Ex Parte SteenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  5. Morton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API