Legal Opinion

United States v. Wayne F. Bartholomew

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 5, 1992No. 91-3297PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Per curiam

Wayne F. Bartholomew, an indigent Federal inmate, appearing pro se, filed a Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence by a person in Federal custody. The Court below determined that the record was sufficient for the purpose of adjudication of movant’s claims, and that an evidentiary hearing was not necessary. The Court then dismissed Bartholomew’s motion with prejudice. Bartholomew is before this Court pro se appealing the Judgment and Order of the District Court dismissing his motion with prejudice without an evidentiary hearing.

FACTS

Appellant and two…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. Charles Jay AutenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. William B. Prince, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Donald Edward DonohoeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. BartholomewCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. United States v. Ludevina Ayala CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. CavittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. Alvin SchlesingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Dwight ReedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
  5. Waymon Spriggs, Jr. v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API