United States v. Wayne F. Bartholomew
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Wayne F. Bartholomew, an indigent Federal inmate, appearing pro se, filed a Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence by a person in Federal custody. The Court below determined that the record was sufficient for the purpose of adjudication of movant’s claims, and that an evidentiary hearing was not necessary. The Court then dismissed Bartholomew’s motion with prejudice. Bartholomew is before this Court pro se appealing the Judgment and Order of the District Court dismissing his motion with prejudice without an evidentiary hearing.
FACTS
Appellant and two…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Charles Jay AutenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. William B. Prince, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Donald Edward DonohoeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- United States v. BartholomewCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
3Cited by62 opinions
- United States v. Ludevina Ayala CervantesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. CavittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Alvin SchlesingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Dwight ReedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Waymon Spriggs, Jr. v. James A. Collins, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.