Legal Opinion

Simmons v. Simmons

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 27, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.

A careful reading of the will leaves little doubt as to the testator’s intent. In the second article of the will, if force is given to all of its expressions, there appears an equivocation and patent ambiguity, and it becomes questionable whether an estate in fee is given in the real property therein devised and a life estate in the personalty described, or whether an estate for life only is given in realty and an absolute estate in full and complete ownership in the personalty; and perhaps whether, by either of the bequests, the wife takes more than a life interest. But by the provision of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Woodruff v. MarshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  2. Wolfe v. HathewaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
  3. Jackson v. AlsopSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  4. Sands v. LyonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1846
  5. Angus v. NobleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pittsfield & North Adams Railroad v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  2. Clarke v. ClarkeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Marzahl v. Colonial Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. Thames Bank & Trust Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  5. Hectman, Administrator v. Savitsky, No. Cv97 34 88 26 S (Mar. 26, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API